Stacking the dies
Silicon Almanac All explainers
Advanced packaging and HBM · Explainer 09

Chips on chips

An AI accelerator is a package of chips: a compute die, stacks of memory dies beside it, and a slab of silicon wiring under both. This page takes one apart, down to the copper that runs through a die.

2 TB/sfrom one HBM4 stack, at most, in the standard
16memory dies in one stack, at most
775 µmthe height the whole stack fits in
Scene: an accelerator package, generic, not any company's design, drawn to one scale. Bandwidth and dies: JEDEC's HBM4 standard, JESD270-4 (April 2025). JEDEC's release gives no height; Semiconductor Engineering reports 775 µm for the standard, and Tom's Hardware reports SK hynix explaining it at Hot Chips 2026. All sources are listed at the end.
Scroll to begin
01 · The package

Layer by layer.

Slide the package apart. On top sit the compute die and the HBM stacks. Microbumps join them to the silicon interposer, which wires them to each other. Bumps under the interposer join it to the package substrate, and solder balls join the substrate to the circuit board.

Amkor, which assembles such packages, names the same three layers: the dies on microbumps, the interposer with vias through it, and the substrate. Ibiden, which makes substrates, gives the substrate's job: wiring measured in nanometres on a chip does not connect directly to wiring measured in micrometres on a circuit board.

Layers: Amkor's 2.5D package article (2018) and TSMC's CoWoS page. The substrate's job: Ibiden; flip-chip bumps up and a main board down: Samsung Electro-Mechanics, for its own substrates. The package is generic and drawn to one scale with a €2 coin (European Central Bank, 25.75 mm). The bumps and balls are drawn far sparser than they are, and the layers' thicknesses are drawn, not a product's.
02 · The memory wall

64 wires, or 2,048.

An AI chip works only as fast as its data arrives from memory. Micron, at Hot Chips 2026, called memory a key factor limiting AI system performance. Think of memory as a motorway. A memory module on a circuit board has 64 lanes. One HBM stack has 2,048. The cars drive at about the same speed. The extra lanes are why the stack moves 40 times as much data. But a circuit board cannot carry 2,048 lanes to a chip: its wires are too wide and too far apart. So the memory moves into the chip's own package, onto silicon wiring at least 10 times as dense, less than a tenth of a millimetre from the processor. That is HBM: memory stacked as close to the processor as it can go, on as many lanes as fit, so the chip waits less for its data.

A DDR5 module on a circuit board carries 64 data bits, as two independent sub-channels of 32. At 6,400 million transfers a second that is 51.2 GB/s. One HBM4 stack carries 2,048 data bits at up to 8 Gb/s each: 2,048 GB/s, 40 times the module.

Amkor writes that HBM2's roughly 4,000 connections need a very high connection density; it joins the stack and the compute die directly to a silicon interposer, under 100 µm apart. On one research chip from ETH Zurich and the University of Bologna, every memory wire is under 4.9 mm long.

DDR5 bits
64
HBM4 bits
2,048
DDR5-6400 module
51.2 GB/s
HBM4 stack at 8 Gb/s a pin
2,048 GB/s

The makers state faster stacks than the standard's 8 Gb/s: Micron more than 2.0 TB/s a stack, Samsung 11.7 Gb/s a pin and up to 3.3 TB/s a stack, SK hynix over 10 Gb/s a pin.

DDR5: JEDEC (July 2020), and Micron's module brief and white paper; the module is drawn at the size Micron gives, 133.35 mm long. HBM4: JEDEC; each maker on its own HBM4 (Micron, June 2025; Samsung, February 2026; SK hynix, September 2025). The gap: Amkor (2018). The wires: Scheffler and others, ETH Zurich and Bologna (2025). Memory as a limit: Micron at Hot Chips 2026, as ServeTheHome reports (August 2026). Wiring density: Amkor (2018) puts a silicon interposer's wiring at 10 times the density of a package substrate, and a circuit board's wiring is wider again, hence at least. The motorway is our comparison: a lane is one data bit, carrying 6,400 million transfers a second on the module and up to 8 Gb/s on the stack, so nearly all of the difference is width. Bandwidths and the ratio are our arithmetic. Lines are drawn in groups, the amber bus 8 of its 64 bits and the cyan one 256 of its 2,048, over the interposer, where they run inside it.
03 · High Bandwidth Memory

Up to 16 dies in 775 µm.

An HBM stack is DRAM dies on a base die, wired straight down through the silicon. JEDEC's HBM4 standard allows 4, 8, 12 or 16 dies of 24 or 32 Gb each, up to 64 GB a stack. Micron has sampled and Samsung ships 12-high HBM4 of up to 36 GB; Samsung plans 16-high at 48 GB, on a base die made in a 4 nm logic process. TSMC offers base dies in its N12 and N3 processes.

The whole stack has to fit in 775 µm, up from 720 µm through HBM3E. SK hynix gives the reason, as Tom's Hardware reports: the logic wafer beside it is 775 µm thick, and a taller stack would stand proud of the processor. A 300 mm wafer is sold 775 µm thick; an ID-1 card is 760 µm.

Capacity, 32 Gb dies
48 GB
Height per layer, average
≈ 60 µm

So each die is thin: 30 to 50 µm, Brewer Science told Semiconductor Engineering, about a third to three-fifths of a hair's width. SK hynix fills the gaps between its dies with a liquid it then hardens, a process it calls MR-MUF. In its 12-high HBM3E, Samsung lays a non-conductive film between the dies and holds them 7 µm apart.

Standard: JEDEC. Makers: Micron (June 2025) and Samsung (February 2026) on their HBM4, SK hynix and Samsung on their 12-high HBM3E (2024); base dies: TSMC (April 2025). The limit: Semiconductor Engineering (January 2026) and Tom's Hardware (August 2026). Wafer: Silicon Valley Microelectronics' product sheet, 775 ± 25 µm. Card: ISO/IEC 7810. Hair: US National Nanotechnology Coordination Office, 80 to 100 µm. Capacity, the height per layer, bond included, and the hair comparison are our arithmetic. The scene is a 2.4 × 1.2 mm piece cut from one stack's edge, to scale; each die is drawn at its share of 775 µm, and the vias and bumps at drawn sizes.
04 · Through-silicon vias

Copper through the chip.

To stack dies, each needs wires straight through its silicon: through-silicon vias. Nvidia wrote in 2016 that one HBM2 die holds over 5,000 of them. The via drawn here is imec's reference, 5 µm across and 50 µm deep, to scale: 10 times deeper than it is wide.

A finished wafer: circuits and wiring on top, 775 µm of silicon below.

Etch: a deep silicon etch, usually the Bosch process, cuts the hole.

Line: an insulator, silicon oxide or nitride, then a barrier, which stops copper atoms diffusing out, and a copper seed coat the walls.

Fill: copper is plated into the hole, and polishing removes what is left on top. The via still ends inside the silicon.

Thin: bonded face down to a support, the wafer is ground from the back and its stress relieved, until the copper shows. Drawn here, the die is now 50 µm thick, the via's depth.

Bump: a copper pillar with a tin-silver cap is plated on the copper, to join this die to the next.

Thickness of this die
775 µm

DISCO, which makes the grinders, has tested silicon thinned to 10 µm or less.

Steps and materials: Shen and Chen, National Chiao Tung University (2017). Etch and plating: Lam Research, for its own tools. Thinning: DISCO, for its own process, and Amkor, which thins interposers to expose their vias. The via: imec (2017). The count: Nvidia's P100 whitepaper (2016). The wafer: Silicon Valley Microelectronics. A cross-section through three vias, to scale; the vias are drawn 40 µm apart, and the wafer's full thickness runs out of the frame until it is ground away. The support is drawn, not a product.
05 · Joining dies

Solder, or copper on copper.

The dies in HBM4 are joined by microbumps; Lam Research's plating tool makes them as copper pillars with a cap of tin-silver solder. Their pitch, centre to centre, has been around 40 µm, and imec expects bonding with solder to stall at a pitch of 10 to 5 µm.

Hybrid bonding drops the solder. Two polished faces are placed together and heated; copper pads set under 2.5 nm below the surface swell into contact and join. JEDEC's higher limit left room for microbumps in HBM4, and SK hynix does not expect hybrid bonding in its HBM before HBM5.

40 µm: microbumps as the industry has long made them, per Semiconductor Engineering and imec.

30 µm: where imec says production microbumps settled (2021), and SK hynix's HBM bumps today, from its Hot Chips 2026 slides as Tom's Hardware reports.

10 µm: HBM4's pad pitch, per Semiconductor Engineering, and where imec expects solder to stall.

9 µm: TSMC's SoIC hybrid bonding in 2023, per Tom's Hardware, and Intel's first Foveros Direct, per Intel.

6 µm: TSMC's SoIC in 2025, per Tom's Hardware.

4.5 µm: TSMC's SoIC, planned for 2029, per Tom's Hardware.

Pads per mm²
625
Pads across one hair
2
Joint
Solder microbump

imec has shown hybrid bonding at 2 µm from die to wafer, and at 200 nm from wafer to wafer.

Pillars and caps: Lam Research, on what its plating tool makes. Pitches: Semiconductor Engineering (January 2026); imec (2017, 2021, 2024); SK hynix and TSMC's steps of 2023 to 2029 as Tom's Hardware reports them (August and September 2026), TSMC's own page saying only that SoIC starts below 10 µm; Intel for Foveros Direct. Hybrid bonding: the recess, imec (2024); the heat and the swelling, Tom's Hardware (September 2026) and ServeTheHome, from SK hynix's Hot Chips 2026 slides; the 2 µm and 200 nm results, imec (2024, 2026). HBM5: SK hynix, reported by Tom's Hardware; TrendForce reports forecasts of 16-high HBM4E as the earliest. Pads per mm² and across a hair, drawn 90 µm wide, are our arithmetic. A 200 × 200 µm patch, to scale with the hair; the upper die is drawn see-through.
06 · The interposer

Bigger than one exposure.

A lithography scanner prints at most one field, 26 by 33 mm: 858 mm². An interposer larger than that is stitched from several fields, each within the limit. TSMC calls its version CoWoS, in volume since 2012, and counts its size in reticles.

In 2016 Nvidia's P100 stood 4 HBM2 stacks beside one GPU in a 55 mm package. TSMC's CoWoS-S reaches 3.3 reticles, about 2,700 mm². TSMC said in April 2025 that it planned 9.5 reticles with 12 stacks or more for 2027. In April 2026 it said it was making 5.5 reticles and planned 14, with about 10 compute dies and 20 stacks, for 2028. The ID-1 card beside it covers 4,621 mm², about a 5.5-reticle interposer.

Area, reticles × 858 mm²
4,719 mm²
HBM stacks
up to 12
When
in production, 2026
Package substrate
over 100 × 100 mm

Above 3.3 reticles TSMC recommends CoWoS-L or CoWoS-R; CoWoS-L sets small silicon bridges in a wiring layer in place of one silicon plate. Intel's EMIB joins large chiplets without a silicon interposer. In October 2025 TSMC's chairman said the company was working hard to narrow the gap between CoWoS demand and supply.

The field: Nikon and Canon, for their own scanners. Stitching: Altera's patent on a stitched interposer (2014). CoWoS: TSMC (its CoWoS page; its symposium releases of April 2025 and April 2026; its Q3 2025 earnings call). 2016: Nvidia's P100 whitepaper; the 1.5 reticles of 2016, the eight stacks at 3.3, the up to 12 stacks and the substrate at 5.5 are Tom's Hardware's report of TSMC's November 2024 forum, which put a 9-reticle version beyond 120 × 120 mm. EMIB: Intel. Card: ISO/IEC 7810. Areas are our arithmetic, reticles × 858 mm², about 5% above TSMC's own 2,700 mm² at 3.3. The drawing shows one silicon plate throughout, and the dies and stacks in a generic layout.
07 · Where to go next

Who makes the layers.

Two accelerators, as their makers describe them, in alphabetical order. AMD's MI355X is 8 vertically stacked compute dies and 2 I/O dies, 185 billion transistors, with 8 stacks of 12-high HBM3E: 288 GB and up to 8 TB/s, peak theoretical. Nvidia's Blackwell GPUs are 2 reticle-limited dies with 208 billion transistors, made in a TSMC 4NP process.

Makers of what this page shows, with pages on this record. The three whose HBM4 this page cites: Micron, Samsung Electronics and SK hynix. The two chipmakers whose packaging it cites: Intel and TSMC. Every company the record files under assembly, packaging and test: Amkor, ASE, Chipbond, ChipMOS, Hana Micron, JCET, King Yuan, Powertech, TongFu and Unisem. Every maker of package substrates it lists: AT&S, DNP, Ibiden, Kyocera, Nan Ya PCB, Shinko Electric, Toppan and Unimicron. Every equipment maker whose record description names packaging: BESI, Camtek, Disco, Hanmi Semiconductor, Kulicke & Soffa and Onto Innovation. Research: imec.

Nvidia: its Blackwell architecture page. AMD: its MI350 microarchitecture documentation and MI355X page. Each group states its rule; within a group, alphabetical.